Aids ArkOctober 9, 2014
Uganda's flagging male circumcision drive
SHAREKAMPALA, 8 October 2014 (IRIN) – Limited funding and personnel,
as well as misconceptions and cultural beliefs, are some of the
challenges hindering Uganda’s goal of circumcising at least 4.2 million
men by 2015 in a bid to lower the country’s HIV/AIDS incidence.
Just 26 percent, about 1.4 million, of the men targeted under the
Safe Male Circumcision (SMC) programme – launched in September 2010 –
had been circumcised by the end of 2013, according to Uganda’s AIDS
Commission (UAC) mid-term review report of the National HIV/AIDS
Strategic Plan (2011-2015).
The US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the
joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) indicate that circumcising 4.2
million Ugandan men in 2011-2015 could help to halve the country’s HIV
incidence. Uganda’s HIV prevalence rate has risen from 6.4 to 7.3
percent over the past five years.
The 4.2 million target represents 80 percent of the estimated number
of uncircumcised men in Uganda. “I don’t think we will achieve the 80
percent target by 2015. The service is limited to a few areas mainly
because of the limited funding from donors and government. PEPFAR
contributes the biggest portion of this fund out of the many donors
supporting health related projects,” Sylvia Nakasi, policy and advocacy
officer, Uganda Network of AIDS Service Organizations (UNASO), told
IRIN.
“Other factors affecting demand are the mixed messages on SMC,
limited coordination of the private and public SMC service providers
which affects timely reporting and quality assurance of the service
provided, limited training of health workers to do SMC surgery,
inadequate SMC supplies, lack of SMC champions and limited health
workers.”
According to the UAC report, about 14 districts (out of 112) had reported no SMC activities by March 2013.
“We have had challenges in building capacity and putting systems in
our health facilities for the service,” Joshua Musinguzi, the programme
manager of the AIDS Control Programme at Uganda’s Ministry of Health,
told IRIN. “We are now focused to consolidate and scale up SMC to try to
achieve our target. We have harmonized communication materials to
create demand, uptake, fight behavioural disinhibition and dispel
myths.”
Myths and misconceptions
The UAC report noted that limited mass awareness on SMC may lead to
risky sexual behaviour. “Disinhibition” implies the loss of inhibition
on behaviour that had been restrained.
“The circumcision disinhibition might cause men to abandon previous
risk reduction behaviours such as partner reduction or condom use. There
are reports of local misperceptions that SMC is a magic bullet to
prevent HIV, a belief that is likely to inhibit safe sex practices,” it
stated.
The report added that the preference for traditional circumcision
among some ethnic groups, such as the Bamasaba and the Bakakonjo, is
affecting government efforts to scale up SMC. SMC is medically carried
out under hygienic conditions to prevent the spread of infectious
diseases, which are risk factors in traditional circumcision.
...
Myths abound. “There are many misconceptions and myths which surround
this intervention. It’s also [a] frightening procedure. Men think of
the risks involved, the pain and how long it will take them to heal,”
added Sarah Kayagi, the chairperson of Uganda’s HIV/AIDS parliamentary
committee. “Some women don’t want their husbands circumcised on grounds
that they will become sexually weaker… Some think it’s meant to convert
people to Islam."
[Not to mention - never to mention -
that men may refuse to be circumcised because they know the value of
their foreskins and that the claimed benefits are insufficient to
justify it.]
...